Letters to the editor

Commentator Sarah Hoyt explains it thusly: “This was a color revolution, which means a revolution that uses the country’s rules and regulations against the country to install a usurping entity under the cover of law. By definition there isn’t a way to remedy this situation within the law. Because the laws were subverted against us and themselves.”

The 2020 election was exceedingly problematic whether one thinks it was stolen, rigged, or not, but it was manipulated beyond description using Covid and private money to alter the outcome. It was the strangest election we have ever had. I don’t think that this is something that the Constitution every contemplated.

The Constitution never envisioned that political workers would go go-to-door to seek out the voters and have them complete ballots on the spot. The Republicans are baffled and stunned. They are unable to recognize such as a legitimate election and don’t know what to do. Do they copy the practices themselves or try to overturn them.

Anyway, I expect the 2024 election to be Donald Trump against Michelle Obama. She will probably win. It’s just a matter of letting the party machinery generate the needed ballots. Trump will mostly be expecting his followers to come to the polls and vote. Two election systems are operating simultaneously. One unauditable and impenetrable, the other transparent.

As Hoyt suggests, only by subverting the laws could such ballot harvesting and universal mail-in ballots practices have been established. Watch for Moore vs. Harper to see if the Supreme Court will allow state courts to override election rules set by state legislatures.

Mike Gramelspacher Jr., Ferdinand